Researchers have developed a new classification of cognitive function for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) that is based on the identification of five cognitive phenotypes.
“This is the first time there has been a complete categorization of cognitive profiles in MS patients,” said lead author Ermelinda De Meo, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan.
“In addition to physical disability, we should also be thinking about cognitive disability,” she said. “They are not always the same. Such measures of cognitive profiles could be considered as a measure of disease progression along with physical disability scores.”
Until now, there have been two categories of cognitive function for MS patients – impaired, or not impaired, Dr. De Meo noted. “This dichotomous categorization is not relevant to the real world where patients do not easily fit into those black and white boxes.”
This study found that, by defining homogeneous and clinically meaningful phenotypes, the limitations of the traditional dichotomous classification in MS can be overcome. These cognitive phenotypes can represent “a more meaningful measure of the cognitive status of patients with MS and can help define clinical disability, support clinicians in treatment choices, and tailor cognitive rehabilitation strategies,” Dr. De Meo and colleagues wrote.
The five profiles follow a rough gradient. Patients are more likely to reach higher-level phenotypes with progressive disease and disease of longer duration, Dr. De Meo reported.
“But we need more data on exactly how these classifications relate to disease progression. In addition, disease-modifying treatments may well influence cognitive profiles too, and this is something that needs to be monitored and investigated,” she said.
|This dichotomous categorization is not relevant to the real world where patients do not easily fit into those black and white boxes.|
The researchers categorized the MS patients into five phenotypes:
|Dr. De Meo and colleagues suggested that their findings may have several implications for clinical management and decision making.
“This categorization of cognitive features could help in planning rehabilitative strategies tailored to subgroups of cognitively homogeneous patients. This categorization could be particularly relevant to patients with mildly impaired profiles who may be the ideal candidates for rehabilitative treatments because they may have higher brain plasticity resources,” they wrote.
“Transition to a more severe phenotype may support the clinical decisions on changes in the pharmacological treatment,” they added.
Use of these cognitive phenotypes can also represent a step forward in research, allowing a better selection of candidates for cognitive rehabilitation trials as well as fostering future studies on the pathophysiologic mechanism of cognitive changes in MS by using more advanced MRI techniques and deep-learning approaches, they wrote.
Although current knowledge does not allow for a complete understanding of the meaning of these phenotypes, their definition represents a starting point for future studies, the authors concluded.
“This is just a cross-sectional study – it is the first step to establishing such cognitive profiles,” Dr. De Meo added. “We aim to continue to follow these patients to see how their cognitive profiles change over time and if there is evolution, but we did show in this study that there is a relation between disease duration and cognitive profile.”
She said her group is ready to use this classification in clinical practice. She noted that the battery of cognitive tests that they used are well established and are familiar to most neuropsychologists.
The researchers are now developing an instrument for automated classification, such that clinicians could enter scores from the various tests, and the machine would determine which profile was applicable to each patient.
“It would be useful for all MS patients to be profiled in this way every couple of years so we can track progression,” Dr. De Meo commented.
De Meo disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.